AI Search Optimization

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)

My generative engine optimization services work on how large language model assistants such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude find, select and describe your business when someone asks for a recommendation or an answer in your category. GEO, also sold as LLMO or ChatGPT SEO, is partly established practice and partly speculation; this page says which is which and what I actually do.

  • Own-brand citation tracking across assistants
  • Built on SEO practice since 2018
  • Nepal, Australia, UK, USA

What generative engine optimization is

When someone asks an assistant “which SEO consultant in Kathmandu should I hire”, “best trekking company for Manaslu” or “compare remittance apps for sending money to Nepal”, the assistant either answers from what it learned in training or, increasingly, runs a live search, retrieves a handful of pages and composes an answer with citations. Generative engine optimization, one of the four services under my AI search optimization hub and part of my SEO services, is the work of being among the pages retrieved, being described accurately, and being the brand named when the question is a recommendation. Much of it is familiar: the pages assistants cite are overwhelmingly pages that already rank, answer clearly and are corroborated elsewhere. What is new is the weight of off-site mentions and entity consistency, and the difficulty of measuring anything precisely.

Who this is for

  • Brands whose buyers now ask ChatGPT or Perplexity for recommendations before searching Google, common in software, professional services, travel planning and eCommerce research.
  • Companies in Australia, the UK and the USA whose competitors are being named in assistant answers and who are not.
  • Businesses that have been described wrongly by an assistant (old address, discontinued product, wrong founder) and want the sources corrected.
  • Nepali businesses selling abroad, where the buyer’s first question to an assistant often includes “in Nepal” and the answer is drawn from whatever directories and articles exist.

What has evidence, and what does not

Supported by evidence and by my own trackingPlausible but unprovenSold widely, no evidence
Pages that rank well in Google and Bing are far more likely to be retrieved and cited by assistants that search live.That particular content formats (statistics, quotations, expert attribution) raise citation rates across all assistants; early studies show effects that vary by system.That a special file, tag or “AI-optimized” writing style guarantees inclusion.
Clear, direct answers with specific facts are quoted more often than vague marketing copy.That mentions on Reddit, Quora and forums directly raise brand recommendations; the correlation is visible, the mechanism is not.That an assistant has a stable ranking that can be bought or engineered.
What assistants say about a brand reflects what third-party sources say: directories, reviews, press, Wikipedia-class references, industry lists.That freshness signals (recent dates, updated content) influence retrieval strongly.That blocking or allowing AI crawlers changes rankings in Google.
Consistent entity data across your site and profiles reduces wrong descriptions.That structured data is read directly by assistants rather than through the search index.Precise “AI visibility scores” from any tool; they are samples.

I apply the first column, test the second where it is cheap to do so, and decline to sell the third.

What the GEO service includes

  • Prompt set and baseline: the recommendation and answer prompts a buyer would use, sampled across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google’s AI features, with your presence, your competitors’ and the sources cited recorded. Delivered through the AI visibility audit.
  • Source mapping: which third-party pages the assistants actually cite for your category (directories, review sites, comparison articles, industry bodies, news), and which of them mention you, mention you wrongly, or omit you.
  • Retrievability: making sure your key pages rank, are crawlable by the assistants’ crawlers (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended) where you want them to be, load fast and contain the answer in the HTML, through my technical SEO service.
  • Citable content: pages that give an assistant a reason to cite you rather than a competitor: original data, clear comparisons, specific prices and processes, expert-attributed explanations, using the answer-first structure from the answer engine optimization service.
  • Off-site presence: listings, profiles, reviews, press and mentions in the sources the assistants draw on, corrected where wrong and added where missing, through the outreach on my link building page.
  • Entity consistency: one set of facts about the business across the site, Google profile, LinkedIn, directories, Wikidata where eligible, and structured data.
  • Re-sampling and reporting: the prompt set re-run monthly, changes recorded with the method, and AI referral traffic from GA4 reported alongside.

How GEO work runs

  1. Baseline audit with the prompt set, source map and referral data.
  2. Foundation: rankings, crawlability, structured data and entity consistency fixed first, because nothing else works without them.
  3. Content: the pages most likely to be retrieved for the prompt set rewritten or created to be citable.
  4. Off-site: corrections and additions to the sources that shape the answers, in order of how often they are cited.
  5. Monthly cycle: re-sample, report, adjust. Expect movement over months, with noise between samples; I show the trend rather than a single reading.

What you receive

  • The baseline report: prompt set, presence, competitors, cited sources and referral traffic.
  • The source map with the corrections and additions planned.
  • Technical, content and entity fixes implemented or briefed.
  • Monthly re-sampling with the method stated, and referral and ranking data alongside.

GEO work is included at the Enterprise tier on the SEO packages and pricing page and available as a project. For the background in plain language, read the AI search optimization guide.

Next step

Request a free AI visibility check and I will sample ten recommendation prompts for your category across the main assistants and report where you appear, where competitors appear and which sources are shaping the answers. All related work is under SEO services.

Frequently asked questions

Is GEO the same as LLMO or ChatGPT SEO?

They are different names for the same aim: influencing how large language model assistants retrieve, describe and recommend a brand. GEO (generative engine optimization) is the most common term; LLMO (large language model optimization) and ChatGPT SEO are used by vendors. The name matters less than whether the vendor can tell you what has evidence and what does not, which this page tries to do.

Should we block AI crawlers or allow them?

It depends on what you want. If you want assistants to retrieve and cite your pages, their crawlers need access, and blocking GPTBot or PerplexityBot removes you from live-search answers. If you are a publisher protecting content from training, blocking is a business decision with a visibility cost. Blocking or allowing them has no known effect on Google rankings; Google-Extended controls Gemini training, not search.

Can you guarantee that ChatGPT will recommend us?

No, and nobody can. Assistant answers vary between sessions, locations and model versions, and there is no stable ranking to buy. What I can do is make sure your pages rank and are retrievable, that the sources assistants draw on describe you accurately, and that you have content worth citing, then show you the sampled trend over months.

How is GEO different from AEO?

AEO is on-page: structuring your own pages so a question gets a quotable answer, which serves snippets, voice and AI answers alike. GEO adds the off-page layer: which third-party sources shape what assistants say about you, whether your pages are retrievable, and whether the facts about you are consistent everywhere. AEO comes first; GEO builds on it.

Does GEO matter for a business in Nepal?

For businesses selling abroad, yes now: a buyer in Sydney asking an assistant for "software development companies in Nepal" gets an answer built from directories and articles, and being in those sources correctly is worth doing. For businesses selling locally, the volume of assistant use is growing and the foundation work (rankings, consistent facts, clear pages) pays off in ordinary search regardless.

Ready to talk about your project?

A free 30-minute call, a straight answer about what would move the numbers, and a written proposal within 48 hours if we are a fit.