Google Ads

App Asset

Also called App extension

An extra link under a Search ad that sends the tap to your app store listing instead of the website.

Quick facts: App Asset

Category
Google Ads
Also called
App extension
Level
Intermediate
Affects
App installs, mobile clicks, campaign choice
Where to see it
Google Ads (Assets, app), Play Console, App Store Connect
In this article4
  1. How an app asset works
  2. Why app assets matter
  3. Where app assets go wrong
  4. What to do about it

How an app asset works

You choose the platform, select the app, and Google adds a separate link beneath the text ad on mobile. Tapping the headline still goes to the website; tapping the app link goes to the store listing. Both are charged as clicks, so the asset does not give you a free second route — it gives the searcher a choice, and you pay whichever one they take.

It is not the same thing as an app campaign. An app campaign is built around installs and takes over most of the targeting and creative decisions; the asset is a small addition to an ordinary Search campaign that still exists to sell whatever the website sells. Choosing between them is really a question of what the campaign is for.

Why app assets matter

For some businesses the app is the product experience and the website is only a brochure. Remittance, banking, delivery and booking services fall into that group: the customer’s real relationship happens inside the app, and every extra step between the search and the install loses people. The asset removes one of those steps.

It also protects a search you would otherwise half-answer. Someone typing your brand name plus the word app has told you exactly what they want. Sending them to a homepage where they hunt for a download link is a worse outcome than a link that goes straight to the listing.

Where app assets go wrong

The usual mistake is adding it because it is available rather than because installs matter. If your goal is a phone call or a form, the app link competes with the thing you actually want and you pay for the distraction. Where installs are genuinely the objective, an app campaign is built for the job and the asset is a poor substitute.

The second is buying traffic to a listing that cannot sell. The click ends on a store page with its own screenshots, description and ratings, and if that page is weak the money is spent before the persuading starts. The third is measurement: without install and in-app conversion tracking in place, nobody can say whether the asset did anything at all.

What to do about it

Decide the campaign’s single job first, then add the asset only if an install genuinely serves it. Before turning it on, treat the store listing as a landing page and fix it — the title, the first screenshots and the opening lines of the description do most of the work, which is the domain of app store optimisation.

Set up install and in-app event measurement so the asset can be judged rather than assumed. And think about the connection the install happens on: a large build downloading over mobile data on a slow connection loses people between the tap and the first open, which matters a great deal for audiences in Nepal and similar markets. A smaller build, or a lighter first launch, protects everything the ad bought.

Do and do not

Do

  • Fix the store listing before you buy traffic to it
  • Track installs and in-app events before judging the asset
  • Add it only where an install serves the campaign goal

Do not

  • Use it as a cheap substitute for an app campaign
  • Let the app link compete with your main conversion
  • Ignore how the download behaves on a slow connection

Questions people ask about this

Is an app asset the same as an app campaign?

No. An app campaign is a campaign type built entirely around driving installs and in-app actions, with Google handling most placement and creative decisions. An app asset is a small extra link attached to an ordinary Search ad. If installs are the point of the spend, use the campaign type; if the app is a convenience for people already coming to the site, the asset is enough.

Does a tap on the app link cost extra?

It is charged like any other click, so you pay whether the searcher chooses the headline or the app link. That is the reason to add it deliberately rather than by default: every tap that goes to the store instead of your enquiry page is money spent on a different outcome, and only you can say whether that outcome is worth more.

Can I show the app link only to people who do not have the app?

Not through the asset itself, which simply offers a link to the store listing. Audience and campaign settings give you more control over who sees your ads generally, and app campaigns can be aimed at engagement with existing users rather than new installs. Expect some taps from people who already have the app installed.

Related terms

Found this useful?

Share it, or ask an AI to summarise it

Back to the glossary

Knowing the term is the easy part

Applying it to your own site and budget is the work. Book a call and I will tell you what actually applies to you.